<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for unscriptable.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unscriptable.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unscriptable.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 04:45:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on OOCSS for JavaScript Pirates by OOCSS for JavaScript Pirates &#124; unscriptable.com - EtondeGroup Blog of Web Applications &#124; EtondeGroup Blog of Web Applications</title>
		<link>http://unscriptable.com/2010/11/15/oocss-for-javascript-pirates/#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator>OOCSS for JavaScript Pirates &#124; unscriptable.com - EtondeGroup Blog of Web Applications &#124; EtondeGroup Blog of Web Applications</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 04:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unscriptable.com/?p=676#comment-166</guid>
		<description>[...] here to see the original: OOCSS for JavaScript Pirates &#124; unscriptable.com  Bookmark on Delicious Digg this post Recommend on Facebook share via Reddit Share with Stumblers [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] here to see the original: OOCSS for JavaScript Pirates | unscriptable.com  Bookmark on Delicious Digg this post Recommend on Facebook share via Reddit Share with Stumblers [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Using AMD loaders to write and manage modular javascript by Where does jQuery fit-in with frameworks like JavaScriptMVC, BackboneJS, SproutCore and Knockout? &#124; Q&#38;A System</title>
		<link>http://unscriptable.com/2011/04/27/using-amd-loaders-to-write-and-manage-modular-javascript/#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator>Where does jQuery fit-in with frameworks like JavaScriptMVC, BackboneJS, SproutCore and Knockout? &#124; Q&#38;A System</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 01:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unscriptable.com/?p=719#comment-165</guid>
		<description>[...] there are many exceptional AMD Loader options for use like RequireJS or LabJS etc. However, jQuery now has define and then competencies [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] there are many exceptional AMD Loader options for use like RequireJS or LabJS etc. However, jQuery now has define and then competencies [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on curl.js &#8211; yet another AMD loader [updated] by jQuery 1.7 Released &#124; Sean Walther&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://unscriptable.com/2011/03/30/curl-js-yet-another-amd-loader/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>jQuery 1.7 Released &#124; Sean Walther&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 02:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unscriptable.com/?p=698#comment-142</guid>
		<description>[...] 50% improvement)Better support for HTML5 in IE (blech, IE)AMD (Asynchronous Module Definition, this guy describes AMD well) support (it will work with AMD compliant loaders)Added jQuery.isNumeric()I would love to thank the [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 50% improvement)Better support for HTML5 in IE (blech, IE)AMD (Asynchronous Module Definition, this guy describes AMD well) support (it will work with AMD compliant loaders)Added jQuery.isNumeric()I would love to thank the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AMD versus CJS. What&#8217;s the best format? by Eric Bréchemier</title>
		<link>http://unscriptable.com/2011/09/30/amd-versus-cjs-whats-the-best-format/#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Bréchemier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 10:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unscriptable.com/?p=778#comment-158</guid>
		<description>Would it be possible to define some kind of intermediate layer that would resolve to either an AMD or a CJS or a static module definition?

I am thinking of something in the like of:

  Function: scope(function closure[, string id[, array needs]])
  Define a new module

  Parameters:
    closure - function(object context), function that may optionally define something by returning it. The context argument provided to the function may contain id/values for each definition available. It may be shared by all modules or specific to each module to enforce sandboxing.
    id - string, optional identifier to store the result of the function in context
    needs - array of identifiers, optional list of modules to wait for in case scope() resolves to an asynchronous implementation. Not all properties may actually be set in context depending on implementation.

One of several implementations could be selected to use AMD, CJS or immediate execution.

The signature of scope() is obviously compatible with AMD and synchronous execution, but I lack experience to tell how it would fare with CJS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would it be possible to define some kind of intermediate layer that would resolve to either an AMD or a CJS or a static module definition?</p>
<p>I am thinking of something in the like of:</p>
<p>  Function: scope(function closure[, string id[, array needs]])<br />
  Define a new module</p>
<p>  Parameters:<br />
    closure &#8211; function(object context), function that may optionally define something by returning it. The context argument provided to the function may contain id/values for each definition available. It may be shared by all modules or specific to each module to enforce sandboxing.<br />
    id &#8211; string, optional identifier to store the result of the function in context<br />
    needs &#8211; array of identifiers, optional list of modules to wait for in case scope() resolves to an asynchronous implementation. Not all properties may actually be set in context depending on implementation.</p>
<p>One of several implementations could be selected to use AMD, CJS or immediate execution.</p>
<p>The signature of scope() is obviously compatible with AMD and synchronous execution, but I lack experience to tell how it would fare with CJS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AMD versus CJS. What&#8217;s the best format? by EmbedJS 0.2 and AMD</title>
		<link>http://unscriptable.com/2011/09/30/amd-versus-cjs-whats-the-best-format/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>EmbedJS 0.2 and AMD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 07:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unscriptable.com/?p=778#comment-157</guid>
		<description>[...] there have been some blog posts lately that compare the pros and cons of each of them, so I don’t want to repeat all of [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] there have been some blog posts lately that compare the pros and cons of each of them, so I don’t want to repeat all of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What is the fastest way to load AMD modules? by Latest News Updates for Web Developers and Designers #1 &#124; Multy Shades</title>
		<link>http://unscriptable.com/2011/09/21/what-is-the-fastest-way-to-load-amd-modules/#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator>Latest News Updates for Web Developers and Designers #1 &#124; Multy Shades</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 16:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unscriptable.com/?p=735#comment-150</guid>
		<description>[...] What is the fastest way to load AMD modules [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What is the fastest way to load AMD modules [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AMD Module Patterns: Singleton by Essential jQuery Plugin Patterns - Smashing Coding</title>
		<link>http://unscriptable.com/2011/09/22/amd-module-patterns-singleton/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>Essential jQuery Plugin Patterns - Smashing Coding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 13:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unscriptable.com/?p=761#comment-153</guid>
		<description>[...] “AMD Module Patterns: Singleton,” John Hann [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] “AMD Module Patterns: Singleton,” John Hann [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on curl.js &#8211; yet another AMD loader [updated] by Essential jQuery Plugin Patterns - Smashing Coding</title>
		<link>http://unscriptable.com/2011/03/30/curl-js-yet-another-amd-loader/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>Essential jQuery Plugin Patterns - Smashing Coding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 13:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unscriptable.com/?p=698#comment-141</guid>
		<description>[...] on these tools are beyond the scope of this article, but I recommend John Hann’s post “curl.js: Yet Another AMD Loader,” and James Burke’s post “ LABjs and RequireJS: Loading JavaScript Resources the Fun [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on these tools are beyond the scope of this article, but I recommend John Hann’s post “curl.js: Yet Another AMD Loader,” and James Burke’s post “ LABjs and RequireJS: Loading JavaScript Resources the Fun [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AMD Module Patterns: Singleton by dojo/lifeIMAGE &#171; The Original BrickEngraver/BrickPrinter</title>
		<link>http://unscriptable.com/2011/09/22/amd-module-patterns-singleton/#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>dojo/lifeIMAGE &#171; The Original BrickEngraver/BrickPrinter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 15:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unscriptable.com/?p=761#comment-152</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Closures for Dummies (or why IIFE !== closure) by JavaScript Magazine Blog for JSMag &#187; Blog Archive &#187; News roundup: Node causes cancer, node cures cancer!</title>
		<link>http://unscriptable.com/2011/10/02/closures-for-dummies-or-why-iife-closure/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>JavaScript Magazine Blog for JSMag &#187; Blog Archive &#187; News roundup: Node causes cancer, node cures cancer!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 07:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unscriptable.com/?p=802#comment-162</guid>
		<description>[...] Closures for Dummies (or why IIFE !== closure) [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Closures for Dummies (or why IIFE !== closure) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

